BigLaw Partner Profits Jump at Proskauer, Crowell, and Latham in 2025
Profits per equity partner rose sharply in 2025 at Proskauer, Crowell & Moring, and Latham & Watkins.
Why it matters: Partner profitability shapes law firm compensation, competition, and incentives for lateral moves. The latest data highlights consolidation of financial gains among top-tier firms.
- Proskauer Rose’s revenue hit $1.58B, with profits per equity partner (PEP) exceeding $5M in 2025.
- Crowell & Moring increased PEP by over 37% to $1.68M; revenue rose 19% to $743.9M.
- Latham & Watkins reported average PEP of $8.65M, among the highest in the sector.
- Am Law 100 average PEP climbed to $3.15M in 2025.
Major U.S. law firms reported significant financial gains in 2025, with marked increases in profits per equity partner (PEP)—a core metric for law firm performance and partner compensation. Proskauer Rose posted a 13.8% rise in revenue, totaling $1.58 billion, and saw average PEP grow 12.6% to over $5 million. Chairman Tim Mungovan cited a strong consecutive two-year run but did not disclose client or matter specifics.
- At Crowell & Moring, gross revenue climbed by nearly 19% to $743.9 million, and PEP was up by more than 37% to $1.68 million. Leadership attributed some of this outperformance to strong contingency matters, alongside higher profitability in core practices.
- Latham & Watkins reported PEP averaging $8.65 million for 2025, ranking among the industry’s top performers.
The average PEP across Am Law 100 firms reached $3.15 million in 2025, signaling profitability growth not just among elites, but across the upper tier of the U.S. legal sector.
With the American legal market valued at $370–$400 billion, increased PEP affects competition for talent, strategic merger activity, and partner compensation trends across firms aiming to stay competitive.
By the numbers:
- $1.58B — Proskauer Rose 2025 gross revenue
- 19% — Crowell & Moring 2025 revenue growth
- $3.15M — Average Am Law 100 PEP in 2025
Yes, but: PEP is an average and does not reflect profit distribution disparities within firms or among nonequity partners.