Canada Supreme Court: NB's lieutenant-governor must be bilingual

3 min readSources: Courthouse News

The Supreme Court ruled Crown reps in New Brunswick must be bilingual.

Why it matters: This decision enforces official bilingualism in New Brunswick’s government, affecting public administration and legal practices in bilingual jurisdictions across Canada.

  • On June 12, 2026, a 6-3 Supreme Court decision mandated the lieutenant-governor of New Brunswick must speak both English and French.
  • The ruling cites Section 16(2) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, guaranteeing equality of English and French in New Brunswick.
  • The decision overturned a New Brunswick Court of Appeal ruling that bilingualism was desirable but not required.
  • The case was triggered by the 2019 appointment of Brenda Murphy, a unilingual anglophone, challenged by the Acadian Society of New Brunswick.

On June 12, 2026, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a landmark 6-3 ruling that the lieutenant-governor of New Brunswick must be bilingual. This decision affirms the constitutional requirement that Crown representatives in the province perform their duties in both official languages — English and French. The Court explicitly referenced Section 16(2) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which guarantees equality of English and French in New Brunswick, Canada’s only officially bilingual province.

This ruling overturned a prior decision by the New Brunswick Court of Appeal, which had concluded bilingualism was desirable for the lieutenant-governor but not constitutionally mandated. The challenge surfaced after the 2019 appointment of Brenda Murphy, a unilingual anglophone lieutenant-governor, raised concerns among the Acadian Society of New Brunswick about infringements on the province’s constitutional language rights.

Chief Justice Richard Wagner, writing for the majority, emphasized the symbolic and practical importance of language equality in governance, stating, "The equality of English and French in New Brunswick must be reflected in the lieutenant-governor's personal ability to speak and to represent the institution in each official language." This reinforces the obligation for the province to ensure that its Crown representatives can communicate effectively with both English-speaking and French-speaking citizens.

The ruling’s implications extend beyond this appointment, signaling potential future requirements for bilingualism in other governmental roles within bilingual jurisdictions. It underscores the constitutional commitment to linguistic equality, a foundational principle in New Brunswick’s administration and legal processes.

By the numbers:

  • 6-3 — Supreme Court split decision on bilingualism requirement
  • 2019 — Year Brenda Murphy was appointed lieutenant-governor
  • Section 16(2) — Charter provision cited mandating equality of English and French

What's next: The ruling sets a precedent impacting future appointments of Crown representatives in New Brunswick, potentially prompting revisions to selection criteria to ensure bilingual proficiency.