OFAC Expands Sanctions Scrutiny Beyond 50% Ownership for Indian Firms
OFAC's latest guidance urges compliance checks beyond formal 50% ownership in sanctions cases.
Why it matters: Indian corporate counsel and compliance teams handling cross-border deals must reassess sanctions risks. Regulatory penalties now target not just ownership, but also control and underlying economic realities.
- OFAC's March 2026 guidance stresses looking past legal ownership to practical control.
- Recent enforcement targeted entities managed by, but not majority owned by, designated persons.
- Penalties topped $215 million for violations involving ‘effective control’ by sanctioned individuals.
- BIS’s 2025 rule broadens export controls to include affiliates meeting the 50% ownership threshold.
The U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is signaling a major shift in sanctions compliance: ownership percentage alone no longer defines risk exposure. In March 2026, OFAC released new guidance highlighting that companies must look 'beyond legal formalities to underlying practical and economic realities' when assessing relationships with sanctioned parties.
- Traditionally, OFAC’s 50% Rule automatically blocked entities owned by designated persons at or above that threshold.
- New enforcement actions, however, show regulators penalizing firms for maintaining business ties with sanctioned individuals who retained control—even when their formal ownership fell below 50%.
For Indian companies conducting cross-border transactions, this means compliance measures must now focus on control, influence, and transaction purpose—not just ownership figures.
- OFAC’s red flags for sham transactions include ongoing involvement of blocked parties, transfers to family, complex structures, and evasive answers around sanctioned individuals’ roles.
- Enforcement examples include a $215 million penalty on GVA Capital and an $11.5 million settlement with IPI Partners, both for managing investments on behalf of Russian oligarch Suleiman Kerimov post-sanctions. Heritage Trust, which held over $1 billion for Kerimov, was also blocked despite indirect relationships.
- The Bureau of Industry and Security has mirrored this broadened approach in export control rules as of September 2025.
OFAC cautions that compliance should never become a ‘check-the-box’ procedure—especially when there is evidence of former sanctioned party involvement. Indian counsel should act now to update policies and detect hidden risks.
By the numbers:
- $215,988,868 — Penalty against GVA Capital Ltd. for post-designation investment management
- $11,485,352 — Settlement with IPI Partners, LLC for receiving funds from a sanctioned individual
- $1 billion+ — Assets held by Heritage Trust for a sanctioned Russian oligarch