Supreme Court Rules for Gun Rights, Eyes Cameras in Courtrooms

3 min readSources: SCOTUSblog

Supreme Court affirms gun rights for marijuana users and supports DUI-related firearm restrictions.

Why it matters: These rulings shape federal and state firearm laws and highlight the court's evolving view on public access and constitutional rights enforcement.

  • June 18, 2026: Supreme Court sides with Texas man challenging gun ban on marijuana users.
  • Justice Gorsuch's majority opinion limits broad prohibitions, protecting non-violent drug users' gun rights.
  • Washington Supreme Court upholds a 2023 law revoking gun rights after two DUI offenses in seven years in a 5-4 decision.
  • The courts continue balancing Second Amendment rights with public safety concerns amid changing legal landscapes.

On June 18, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a unanimous decision in favor of Ali Danial Hemani, a Texas resident who challenged the federal law barring firearm ownership by illegal drug users, notably marijuana consumers. Justice Neil Gorsuch authored the opinion, criticizing the "law’s outdated logic in light of changing societal and legal norms around cannabis," and ruling that the blanket prohibition violates the Second Amendment as it unjustifiably assumes all marijuana users are dangerous. This ruling protects non-violent, non-impaired users like Hemani from broad gun ownership bans but leaves room for future prosecutions where drug users are deemed dangerous (AP News).

At the state level, the Washington State Supreme Court upheld a 2023 law that strips gun rights from individuals convicted of two DUI-related offenses within seven years. The 5-4 decision referenced the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2024 ruling in United States v. Rahimi to support the restriction as consistent with historical firearm regulation traditions. While advocates for gun rights criticized the ruling, dissenting justices argued DUI convictions alone do not justify overriding constitutional protections (Axios).

These cases illustrate the courts' ongoing efforts to define the boundaries of the Second Amendment while considering public safety and evolving drug policies. Concurrently, the Supreme Court is reportedly revisiting the issue of allowing cameras in federal courtrooms, signaling a potential shift toward greater courtroom transparency, although details remain scarce at this time.

By the numbers:

  • June 18, 2026 — Date of Supreme Court decision protecting marijuana users' gun rights
  • 5-4 — Washington Supreme Court vote upholding DUI-related gun rights revocation law
  • 2023 — Year Washington enacted the DUI-related gun rights revocation statute
  • 2024 — Year of U.S. Supreme Court's <em>United States v. Rahimi</em> decision cited in Washington case

Yes, but: While the Supreme Court restricts broad gun bans on marijuana users, it does not bar prosecutions against those considered dangerous, maintaining some enforcement scope.

What's next: Supreme Court discussions on permitting courtroom cameras continue, with possible future rulings expected on gun safety laws and public firearm carry limits.